Blast from the past – when Taft-Carter’s Medicare math was off

Remember this from January?

Judge Taft-Carter’s decision in the Providence Medicare case on Monday contained this rather odd passage:

“Moreover, the Court notes that $6 million in lost savings – although hardly a paltry sum – is less than 1% of the City’s approximate $1.5 billion in liabilities for non-pension post-retirement employment benefits. Immediate receipt of these alleged savings would not save the City from financial ruin.”

That’s an apples-to-oranges comparison. The $6 million is how much the city projects it will save from moving retirees to Medicare in one fiscal year. The $1.5 billion is how much the city projects it owes them in health benefits forever.

In retrospect, Taft-Carter’s rationalization looks even more mistaken. Providence faced a cash flow crunch last winter – an insolvency crisis – and the $6 million absolutely was desperately needed. It’s worth watching how she deals with the accounting issues in the state pension case.

The headline on this item has been updated.

blog comments powered by Disqus